data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55d3b/55d3bfc8472b357818b2969c5ec2e633ad636afd" alt=""
Fortunately, the teen tragedy did not quench my love for the writings of Shakespeare and I have continued to feed upon the fruits of his imagination for more than 20 years now. Ironically, it is this lifelong appreciation that has brought me full circle: studying Romeo and Juliet in a classroom setting, this time by elective choice. Another irony, I will have finished reading through the tragic love story on the cusp of the most commercialized of holidays: Valentine's Day. While I now have a richer understanding as well as appreciation for what William Shakespeare was really creating in his telling of this tale of ill-fated love I am reminded, especially at this "romantic" time of year, of what has provoked my dislike. The notion of love and romance as a spontaneous and predetermined master of the human race seems like a limited and disingenous reflection of the deeper nature and meaning of what it is to love. Just as a box of chocolates, overpriced flowers, teddy bears hugging balloons, or even diamonds and pearls gifted on one established day a year can't approach the value of a deep loyal and fervent passion, neither can the poetic dramatics of two 14 year old children genuinely express the meaningfulness of love based on understanding, self-sacrifice, and true vulnerability. It is a heady, impatient passion that drives these two lovers to their tombs....one wonders what would have been the long term nature of their relationship if patience and thoughtfulness had tempered youthful desire.
Agreed! Frankie and I celebrated Valentine's day simply, but we always said...shouldn't everyday be a day for love? I think many do not understand the true nature of what it is to love; and dare I say, even Mr. Shakespeare had it wrong.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Jen. Great great.
ReplyDelete